Legal Opinion

Titanor v. Paxton & Vierling Iron Works

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1933No. 28363PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Raper, District Judge.

This is an action by Societe Titanor against the Paxton & Vierling Iron Works, in which plaintiff asks recovery of purchase price of a quantity of bar steel sold under written contract. The petition of plaintiff sets forth the written order, and alleged delivery of the steel, and alleges in paragraph 1 that plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of France. The defendant in its answer denies paragraph 1 of the petition, and admits giving the order and that it duly received the steel, and alleged that the steel furnished by plaintiff could not be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Gas Construction Co. v. LiscoNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ayres v. Atlas InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. U. S. Tire Dealers Mutual Corp. v. LauneNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. B. Grunwald, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Retail Merchants Service v. John Bauer & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API