Goldman v. Blum
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal, from. Victoria. Tried below before the Hon. H. Clay Pleasants. This suit was jointly brought by Leon & H. Blum and Heidenheimer Bros, against A. Goldman, administrator of the estate of T. C. Barden, deceased, and Eva L. Barden, his widow, and John Owens, to recover against said estate, in favor of Leon & II.
Read the full summary
Appeal, from. Victoria. Tried below before the Hon. H. Clay Pleasants. This suit was jointly brought by Leon & H. Blum and Heidenheimer Bros, against A. Goldman, administrator of the estate of T. C. Barden, deceased, and Eva L. Barden, his widow, and John Owens, to recover against said estate, in favor of Leon & II. Blum, the sum of $4,000, with interest thereon from the 12th day of March, 1877, and to recover in favor of Heidenheimer Bros, the sum of $5,267.92, with interest thereon-from the date aforesaid, and to foreclose a deed of trust executed by Barden and wife. The basis of the suit…
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
West, Associate Justice.
There is only one ground taken in the motion for rehearing that will require any notice. To that attention will be very briefly called. 6
Before doing so, however, we will take advantage of this occasion to make an observation or two having no reference to the present motion, in addition to what has been said in the original opinion, in-relation to some points that are there considered.
Lest it might be supposed that the cases of Lindsay v. Price, 33 Tex., 282, and Frank v. Kaigler, 36 Tex., 305, are overruled by *642this case, it is proper to add something to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Benedict v. . CowdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Smith v. StrahanTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Spann v. SternsTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Gibson v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.