Legal Opinion

H. A. Whitacre, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 25, 1935No. 3850Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The appellant imported at the port of New York, on various dates from April 14, 1924, to August 30, 1928, certain shipments of articles afterwards stipulated to be works of art. These were classified after entry, by the collector at the port, as manufactures of marble under paragraph 233 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

The importer filed twenty-two protests covering all of the entries, in which it claimed the goods to be free of duty under paragraph 1704 or 1708, or, alternatively, dutiable as works of art under paragraph 1449 of said act. The protests under said paragraphs 1704 .and 1708 are not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Frei Art Glass Co. v. UnitedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Bear River Paper & Bag Co. v. City of PetoskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API