Legal Opinion

American State Bank of Dickinson v. Hoffelt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1976No. Civ. 9213PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAND, Judge.

Plaintiffs, American State Bank,of Dickinson and the Bank of North Dakota (hereinafter banks), appeal from an order of the district court of Williams County denying their motion for a change of venue. The motion was made under § 28-04-07(3), North Dakota Century Code, on grounds that it would promote the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice. The trial court decided the motion without oral argument.

This action is before us for the second time. The first appeal, also on the issue of change of venue, was by defendant Hoffelt. [American State Bank of Dickinson v. Hoffelt,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curren v. StoryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Kiley v. MecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McConnon & Co. v. SlettenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. American State Bank of Dickinson v. HoffeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bartholomay v. St. Thomas Lumber CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stonewood Hotel Corp. v. Davis Development, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Putnam Ranches, Inc. v. O'Neill Production Credit Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Marshall v. City of BeachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API