Legal Opinion

Gilley v. Jarvis

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 7, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal in Chancery. Bill to restrain the further prosecution of a suit at law. Heard on a findings of fact at the December Term, 1918, Orange County, Wilson, Chancellor. Decree for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

The plaintiff, George Gilley of Tunbridge in the county of Orange, by his writ dated October 27, 1917, served October 29th, and -returnable to Orange County Court, brought suit against the defendant, Peter E. Jarvis of Windsor within the jurisdiction of the municipal court for the Windsor Probate District, in an action of tort for negligence of the latter in connection with the operation of an automobile, Gilley claiming that he was negligently run into by .Jarvis, and his automobile thereby injured. The suit was entered in court on November 13, 1917. Appearance was entered for Jarvis, but as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Pacific Live Stock Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Blondin v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  5. Powers v. Trustees of Caledonia County Grammar SchoolSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cambria v. JefferyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  3. Fletcher v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  5. Weiner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API