Legal Opinion

Finnell v. United States

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 4, 2019No. 2:13-cv-00397Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:13-cv-00397-JVB ) (arising from 2:11-cr-108-JVB-PRC) TITUS FINNELL ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Titus Finnell moves for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. This Court previously granted his accompanying motions for a hearing and for appointment of counsel. For the reasons below, this Court denies Defendant’s motion for § 2255 relief. A. Overview of the Case On July 21, 2011, a grand jury indicted Defendant on four counts related to his involvement in a conspiracy to rob a false…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Richard Joseph FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Ronald Jarrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API