Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abney v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2007No. 2004-SC-000937-DGPublished

1DissentGraves, Justice

Respectfully, I dissent.

The majority opinion rewards and discharges a wrongdoer who made no attempt to contribute or to settle. This is truly a windfall absolution for the tortfea-sor who will not share making reparation to his prey. Moreover, a trap was set for the unwary and innocent Appellant thus preventing his receiving full compensation.

Personal injury releases are contracts whereby the victim party accepts monetary consideration and agrees in return to forego claims against the tortfeasor. Viewing the problem by the simple notion that most individuals are capable of managing their own…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Breen v. PeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Louisville & Evansville Mail Co. v. Barnes' Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. Stephen Bodzo Realty, Inc. v. WILLITS INTERN. CORP.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. CardwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API