Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. Henry Bank, Jr., Judge. Action to quiet title. From a decree in plaintiff’s favor, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

1 Two motions are submitted with, the case. One seeks to strike the additional abstract of appellee because not filed within the time prescribed by the rules. Appellee claims the delay was caused by the fact that appellant took from the clerk’s office the transcript of evidence, and kept it, despite appellee’s frequent requests therefor. This is denied' by appellant. We shall not attempt to settle this controversy, but shall overrule the motion, because we do not strike an abstract on the ground *450that it is not filed in time under the rules unless there is some showing of prejudice, and no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Fort Madison v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Byington v. StoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mahaska County v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. McCash v. PenrodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Wood v. YearousSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Badertscher v. Independent Ice Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Larsen v. CadySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API