Hispanic Taco Vendors of Washington v. City of Pasco
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
SUMMARY OF OPINION
The vending ordinance which was adopted by the Pasco City Council at a public meeting on June 17, 1991, is not unconstitutional.
The City of Pasco is granted broad authority to solve what it perceives to be social or economic problems. The City has demonstrated that its new ordinance is not irrational, that it gives fair warning of what Pasco requires of vendors, and that the ordinance is unlikely to be enforced in an arbitrary manner. Therefore, Pasco’s vendor regulations do not deny due process of law.
The Court has carefully reviewed all of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hispanic Taco Vendors of Washington v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Hispanic Taco Vendors Of Washington v. City Of PascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Reyes v. North Texas Tollway AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016