Legal Opinion

Railroad Commission v. Lacy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1936No. 8564; Motion No. 8536PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

This case arose as follows: W. D. Lacy, operating under the trade-name of the Lacy Reclamation Plant, claiming to be the owner of 13,975 barrels of waste or fugitive crude-oil stored in open pits and steel tanks erected by him in the town of Kilgore in Gregg county, and to have been entrapped by him on Said premises between August *12015, 1935, and January 7, 1936, on the latter date applied to the Tender Board of the Railroad Commission on form SW-3 for a permit to move that amount of crude oil. Hearing was had on said application on January 24, 1936, and said permit refused by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of San Angelo v. DeutschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rd. Commission of Texas v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Beaver Reclamation Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Railroad Commission v. Gladewater Refining Co. Pipe LineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Beaver Reclamation Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Curtis v. Railroad Comm. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API