Legal Opinion

Hare v. Winfree

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1924No. 18611PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

On the 22d day of June, 1923, appellant instituted this action against respondent for the recovery of $110, due for the month of June as rental for an apartment in a building in Spokane belonging to appellant. On July 12, 1923, respondent made a motion to strike out certain portions of the complaint. This motion was granted and an amended complaint served on the 26th day of September, 1923, and thereafter, on leave of court, an amended and supplemental complaint was filed including an additional $110 for the month of August.

The answer of the respondent offered as an affirmative defense to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harsin v. OmanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. McDole v. McDoleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Helsley v. American Mineral Production Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  2. In Re Trust Under Will of DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Lekse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Boyle v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Berner v. ManningConnecticut Superior Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API