Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Wagner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1896No. Nos. 9886-(201)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Duluth against W. A. Wagner, defendant, and National Bank of Commerce, garnishee. Pabst Brewing Company intervened as claimant. The court, Edson, J., found in favor of plaintiff and against the claimant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, the claimant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

■MITCHELL, J.

The defendant, being engaged in the saloon business, and having borrowed of the claimant $1,000, with which to pay his license, executed to it a chattel mortgage on his stock of liquors’ and saloon supplies, of the value of $1,500, to secure the loan and interest, payable in twelve monthly instalments, accord*266ing to the conditions of twelve promissory notes. Seventy-three dollars of the receipts from the sales of the liquors and supplies in the saloon having been deposited with the garnishee by defendant to his own credit as “agent,” the plaintiff garnished it as defendant’s…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Townsend v. KendallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  3. Smith v. BarclaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank of Fargo v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pabst Brewing Co. v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Pabst Brewing Co. v. ButchartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Donohue v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Harris v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API