Legal Opinion

In Re Akzo Nobel Chemical, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 31, 2000No. 09-00-142 CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID FARRIS, Justice (Assigned).

The issues presented by this petition for writ of mandamus involve the proper venue for a petition for depositions under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202, and whether Rule 202 authorizes a trial court to order discovery other than by deposition.

The real party in interest, Beatrice Sem-ien, and her late husband, Anthony Sem-ien, petitioned the Respondent, invoking Rule 202, and sought a deposition preserving the testimony of Anthony Semien, an order requiring Relators to designate and produce witnesses to be deposed, and access to the site of an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. K Mart Corp. v. SandersonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gorman-Rupp Corp. v. KirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Hewlett Packard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  2. Louis Cognata v. Down Hole Injection, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  3. In Re Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
  4. In Re KiberuCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. in Re: City of Tatum, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API