Legal Opinion

People v. Heidgen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that his Alford plea should not have been accepted because the record does not contain strong evidence of his actual guilt is unpreserved for our review as he has moved neither to withdraw his plea nor to vacate the judgment *982of conviction (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545 [2007]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. BrockwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. AzorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. BROCKWAY, STEVEN P., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. BrockwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API