Legal Opinion

Kimberlin v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 30, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, respondent here, filed petition in two counts to determine interest in and quiet title to (under Sec. 1520, R.S. 1929, Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 1520, p. 1682) the lands described, and in ejectment. Defendant, by his answer, claimed to be "the owner in fee simple of all the lands described" in plaintiff's petition, and denied that plaintiff had any interest in said lands. The reply was a general denial. The cause was submitted to a jury, and the verdict was for plaintiff. Failing to get new trial on motion, defendant appealed. No bill of exceptions was filed, and there is nothing here,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Webster v. KnightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Benne v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Newton v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Ebbs v. NeffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Buttron v. BridellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thorne v. ThorneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. ZitkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hallauer v. LackeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Hinton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API