Legal Opinion

Marks v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 25, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Daniel Marks against the Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMacLEAN, J.

Orally pleading, the defendant answered “General denial” to the plaintiff’s complaint, “Action on bond,” and after trial judgment was rendered by the trial justice, in favor of the defendant. Theretofore, as appears from the record in an action in the Supreme Court entitled W. R. Howard & Co. v. Daniel Marks (no written opinion), the plaintiff therein obtained an attachment, and the defendant herein became surety on a bond reciting:

“That if the defendant recover judgment in this action, or if the warrant of attachment is vacated, the plaintiff above named will pay all costs which may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Epstein v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fuchs v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API