Legal Opinion

Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. v. Reliance Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. Nos. 03-55548, 03-55611PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 24, 2005 and appearing at 421 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2005) is hereby amended as follows:

1) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11371, third to last line: after “state court do” add “under the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), Cal. Ins. Code §§ 1064.1-.12”

2) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11372, lines 5-6: replace “Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), Cal. Ins. Code §§ 1064.1-.12” with “UILA”

3) 421 F.3d at 856, Slip Op. p. 11378, line 16: after “stay its proceedings” add “under the UILA”

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Hawthorne Savings F.S.B. Hawthorne Financial Corporation v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in Her Capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006