Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Beery

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1957No. 5624PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetree, P. J.

This is an appeal on questions of law by defendant, appellant herein. The sole question presented is whether a court of record is empowered to suspend or revoke a motor vehicle operator’s license after conviction or a plea of guilty when prosecuted under a hit-and-run ordinance of a charter city, to wit, Columbus, Ohio. The state statute involved is Section 4507.16, Revised Code.

Defendant, Harry Clinton Beery, entered a plea of guilty to being the driver of a certain motor vehicle upon a street in the city of Columbus, which had a collision with the automobile of another due to the driving of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Marquette v. Police CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati (City) v. PhelpsCincinnati Municipal Court · 1961
  2. Hiram (Village) v. ConnerRavenna Municipal Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API