Legal Opinion
People v. Bradley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). We conclude that the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).
We reject defendant’s contention that the Trial Judge erred in refusing to reconsider the Sandoval ruling by the Judge initially assigned to the case. There is no requirement that the Judge who tries a case make the Sandoval ruling. Moreover, the Trial Judge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. CurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Ahmad Abd'al Muntaqim v. HerbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. DiSimoneNew York Supreme Court · 2009