Porous Plaster Co. of Sing Sing v. Seabury
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. George J. Seabury, impleaded with one Johnson, was at special term adjudged guilty of contempt of court. From the order made in the case he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.
The injunction granted in this case, the substance of which was embodied in the judgment entered on the 6th of January, 1875, was to the effect that the defendants, Seabury and Johnson, were enjoined from infringing the plaintiff’s trade-marks, “Allcock’s India-Rubber Porous Plasters,” and from the use of the words “Allcock’s India-Rubber Porous,” or either of them. They are perpetually enjoined from affixing or applying, or causing to be affixed or applied, to any plasters manufactured, sold, shipped, or supplied by them, or to the boxes in which the same are put up, the plaintiff's…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sullivan v. Judah & WeedNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Clark v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- Moat v. HolbeinNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Weeks v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- German Savings Bank v. . HabelNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. New York Movers Tariff Bureau, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Howard S. Tierney, Inc. v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Prince Manufacturing Co. v. Prince's Metallic Paint Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
- Standard Stock Farm v. National Trotting Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1890