Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 30, 2007No. 23835-1-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Whether factual findings are sufficient to support the essential elements of a crime is a question of law. Whether factual inferences from historical facts are supported by the record is also a question of law. Intent is an essential element of assault. Mr. Baker claims the State did not prove he intentionally assaulted two police officers when he deliberately drove his car into a police car and a police motorcycle. He says his ultimate goal was just to get away, and the court should have inferred this from *881the evidence. We agree with the State that the evidence was sufficient to prove the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BencivengaWashington Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco InzunzaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Kathryn Taylor v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Kathryn Taylor v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. Aurora Lillian AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington v. Kevin Albert RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API