Legal Opinion

Pacheco-Gonzalez v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. WCB 91-11930; CA A76749PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order holding that the Board lacks jurisdiction to conduct a hearing when a Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) order on reconsideration is invalid, and also lacks authority to remand the case to DIF. We reverse.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury. She was declared medically stationary, with no award for permanent partial disability, by a notice of closure from DIF. On reconsideration, DIF affirmed the notice of closure. Because there was a dispute over the impairment findings used to close the claim, a medical arbiter’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anaconda Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Benzinger v. Oregon Department of Insurance & FinanceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gallino v. Courtesy Pontiac-Buick-GMCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Scheller v. Holly HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Sheridan v. Johnson Creek MarketCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Soto v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Alatalo v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API