Scheible v. Schickler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff! from an order of tbe district court for Ramsey county, Egan, J., granting the motion of defendant Benz for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
Action to enforce a mechanic’s lien. On July 7, 1890, the defendant Schickler was erecting eight houses on eight adjacent lots owned by him in St. Paul. On that day he entered into a written contract with plaintiff! and his partner whereby they agreed to furnish and place in each of these houses a hot-air furnace of a specified kind, number, and size, with certain specified connections; the furnaces in the two end houses to be of larger size than the furnaces in the six middle houses; and in consideration thereof Schickler agreed to pay therefor the sum of $920. This contract also contained…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Worthen v. CleavelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coughlan v. LonginiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Joplin Sash & Door Works v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Shaw v. FjellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- W. P. Nelson Co. v. WeylIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.