Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Elmore's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 21, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Modifying former opinion.

Since rendering the original opinion in this case, which is reported in 180 Ky. 733, we have concluded that we misinterpreted as well as misapplied one principle of law involved in the case, which is whether the defendant and appellant, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., was under the duty of having its engine which collided with the handcar in which the decedent was riding and which produced the accident equipped at the time with a headlight, and on our own motion modify the opinion as herein indicated. In the opinion it is said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry Co. v. Yocum's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mullins' AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Elmore's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Yocum's Administratrix v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Elmore's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Nelson's Adm'x v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API