Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. City of Newport

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

If the plaintiff has a valid claim against the municipality for services performed, disbursements made, or obligations incurred by him as city clerk and treasurer and clerk of the city council, or by reason of any improper interference by the city council with his rights and duties as such, he has an adequate remedy in a court of law, although he cannot expect to recover upon separate rights of action in contract and tort combined in one and the same proceeding, as he has attempted to do in his bill of equity. Ware v. Estabrooks, 73 Vt. 92, 94, 50 Atl. 543; Dean v. Cass, 73 Vt. 314, 315, 50…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Stearns, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Dean v. CassSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  3. Holman Ex Rel. Holman v. Randolph National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  4. Ware v. EstabrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Badlam and AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API