Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 13, 1924No. 11630Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Acting Associate Justice E. M. Rucker

(concurring) : I concur with Mr. Justice Cothran’s opinion upon the questions raised by the appeal.

There is another matter in the case not presented by the exceptions, but evidenced by the undisputed facts, that in my judgment should be passed upon.

In considering the question now being raised for the first time in this opinion, differing as it does from the points deemed necessary to- be passed upon by the learned Judge, and also differing from the questions raised by the appellants’ attorneys, and upon the advisability of now passing upon it, I find…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Briggs v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Van Wyck v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Beeler v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Keeley v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API