Legal Opinion

In re Riley

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided September 29, 2017No. CASE NO. 17-80108PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REASONS FOR DECISION DISALLOWING REIMBURSEMENT OF ADVANCES THROUGH DEBTOR’S CHAPTER 13 PLAN

JOHN W. KOLWE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

Before the Court on confirmation is Sharon Boyd Riley’s (“Debtor”) Chapter 13 plan which proposes to pay her attorney, Thomas C. McBride (“McBride”), as an administrative expense of her estate, the “no-look” attorney fee allowed by standing order in this District plus reimbursement of advances made by McBride to pay the filing fee and other prepetition costs on behalf of the Debtor. McBride advanced these costs as part of his “no-money-down” Chapter 13…

2Cases cited25 opinions

Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
In Re Jartran, Inc., Debtor. Fruehauf Corporation v. Jartran, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
In the Matter of Bobby Cahill, Janice Cahill, Debtors. Walker & Patterson, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Thomas McBride v. Sharon RileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019