Legal Opinion

King v. Westfield Insurance

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 18, 2005No. 04-2887(JRT/FLN)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kimberly King was injured when an underinsured motor vehicle struck her while she and her partner were unloading a dryer from the back of her employer’s delivery truck. The delivery truck was insured by defendant Westfield Insurance Co. The policy provides coverage for “ ‘bodily injury’ sustained by the ‘insured’ caused by an ‘accident’.” (Rod-lund Aff. Ex. D.) An insured is defined as anyone “ ‘occupying’ a covered ‘auto’.” Id. “ ‘Occupying’ means in, upon, getting in, on, out or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Short v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fjelstad v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API