Legal Opinion

Coates v. J. M. Bucheimer Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 5, 1966No. [No. 195, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

In this workmen’s compensation case, the primary question presented is whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for a directed verdict in favor of the employer on the ground that the injury suffered by the employee did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. The employee (Ruth N. Coates) is the appellant and the employer (J. M. Bucheimer Co., Inc.) is the appellee. As usual, only the facts are different: the law has not changed.

The employee, who had been employed for about six months prior to her injury, operated a machine used in the manufacturing of leather goods.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pariser Bakery & State Accident Fund v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Perdue v. BrittinghamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Spencer v. Chesapeake Paperboard Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Scherr v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tavel v. Bechtel CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Proctor-Silex Corp. v. DeBrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Sica v. Retail Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Knoche v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Giant Food, Inc. v. GoochCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API