Legal Opinion
New York Central Railroad v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.
Both plaintiff New York Central and defendant New Haven on this motion ask for summary judgment. They rest their case on undisputed documents.
The questions involved in this case are of the gravest character, involving consequences of great magnitude. The court has given to them its most earnest and deliberate consideration.
Central, in its complaint, asks for judgment under article 15 of the Beal Property Law: “ 1. That defendant [New Haven] and every person claiming under it be forever barred from all claim or claims to any interest of any kind whatsoever on the property herein described…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- New Haven Inclusion CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Reltron Corp. v. Voxakis Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Penn Central Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1985
- Plaza v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.