Legal Opinion
State v. Holm
Utah Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 2006No. 20030847Published
1Opinion of the Court
137 P.3d 726 (2006)
2006 UT 31
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Rodney Hans HOLM, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 20030847.
Supreme Court of Utah.
May 16, 2006.
Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., Paul F. Graf, Kristine Knowlton, Laura B. Dupaix, Asst. Att'ys Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.
Max D. Wheeler, Rodney R. Parker, Salt Lake City, for defendant.
DURRANT, Justice:
¶ 1 In this case, we are asked to determine whether Rodney Hans Holm was appropriately convicted for bigamy and unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. Specifically, we are asked to determine whether Holm's behavior violated Utah's…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited94 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.