Hatch v. Christmas
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa. (Arnold J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This suit originated in justice’s court, and was removed to the circuit court by a writ of certiorari, where the judgment of the court below was affirmed.
The assignments of error contained in the affidavit for certiorari are all rendered unimportant by the return of the justice to the writ, excepting the fifth, which reads as follows:
“That the justice erred in adjourning said cause to the twenty-eighth day of January, 1887.”
The reasons alleged why such adjournment was erroneous are—
“ 1. That no showing was made for an adjournment, by the oath of the plaintiff or otherwise, that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Deitz v. GroesbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. B'd of Aldermen of NewportSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
- Moore v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Smith v. KistlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Anderson & Son v. HjerrildSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915