Legal Opinion
Iconlab Inc. v. Valeant Pharm. Int'l, Inc. (In re Malyugin)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 17, 2018No. Case No. 1:18–mc–00049 (TNM); Case No. 8:16–cv–01321–LJS–KESPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, United States District Judge
Dr. Boris Malyugin, a Russian national, seeks to quash a third-party subpoena served on him on April 15, 2018 noticing a deposition and the production of documents for April 17, 2018. Mem. in Supp. of Emergency Mot. to Stay and Quash Third-Party Subpoena ("Mot. to Quash")
*52, 8, ECF No. 1-1. Because the subpoena was served two days prior to the deposition, and compliance will require Dr. Malyugin to travel more than 100 miles from where he resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person, the motion to quash is granted. See Fed. R.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Northrop Corporation v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Probulk Carriers Ltd. v. Marvel International Management & TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
3Cited by2 opinions
- Catherine TrinhUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2022
- McCabe v. AlbrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024