Legal Opinion

JNT Properties, L.L.C. v. KeyBank National Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2012No. 2011-1392PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} The parties in this case disagree about whether a clause in a promissory note is ambiguous. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the clause is not ambiguous, and we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Background

{¶ 2} Appellant, KeyBank National Association, loaned money to appellee, JNT Properties, L.L.C. The promissory note that memorializes their agreement includes language that, JNT argues, fixes the rate of interest at 8.93 percent per annum, but KeyBank is charging 8.93 percent every 360 days, a higher rate. KeyBank counters that the note fixes the rate using the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kreisler & Kreisler, LLC v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John M. Abbott, LLC, Class Representative and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lake City BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Ely Ents., Inc. v. FirstMerit Bank, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. Webster v. Altenloh Brinck & Co., U.S., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API