Legal Opinion

Snell v. Murray

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 13, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

121 N.J. Super. 215 (1972)

296 A.2d 538

RUFUS SNELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

THOMAS MURRAY AND THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 20, 1972.

Supplemental Material Submitted October 25, 1972.

Decided November 13, 1972.

Before Judges LABRECQUE, KOLOVSKY and MATTHEWS.

Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent, Gross & Picillo, attorneys; Nadine Taub, on the brief).

Mr. Leonard Rosenstein argued the cause for respondent City of Newark (Messrs. Feuerstein, Sachs & Maitlin,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peer v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Snell v. MurrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Kyreacos v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Zalewski v. GallagherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Cosgrove v. LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  5. Roth v. First National State Bank of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API