Legal Opinion

Mastry v. St. Petersburg Bank & Trust Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 25, 1966No. 5566Published

1Opinion of the Court

DEKLE, HAL P., Associate Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment for the appellee-bank which was plaintiff below, on a series of five bearer notes totaling $10,000.00. The bank claims to be a holder in due course for value and defendant (appellant) Mastry, as maker of the notes, denies this and additionally asserts failure of consideration and further that as an accommodation maker that prior to delivery he revoked and withdrew his accommodation. The admitted facts do not support the last contention and we shall consider the other points raised.

The factual basis asserted for the alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. Rivers v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Robertson v. Northern Motor Securities Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Whitehall Realty Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API