Legal Opinion

Premier Laundry, Inc. v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion the order appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion denied because the moving affidavits fail to set forth a sufficiently clear case to warrant the granting of the temporary injunction in this action. (See Clark Paper & Mfg. Co. v. Stenacher, 236 N. Y. 312; Levy v. Cosmos, 221 App. Div. 533.) The only solicitation disclosed in the record was through a letter circulated by a trade association to all of its members, who apparently were openly engaged in a type of business commonly known to use or require laundry service.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Levy v. CosmosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Seligman & Latz, Inc. v. NoonanNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Abalene Pest Control Service, Inc. v. PowellNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Standard Coat, Apron & Linen Service, Inc. v. LaganaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API