Legal Opinion

Herrick v. Ammerman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Morrison county, Collins, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action of ejectment to recover possession of premises situated in Morrison county, described as lot 5, block 39, in the village of Little Falls, according to the plat thereof on file. The plaintiff claims title under a sale on executions issued out of the district court for Hennepin county, on three judgments against the “Little Falls Manufacturing Company,” then the owner of the premises. Two of these judgments purported to have been rendered by a justice of the peace in Hennepin county, transcripts of which were filed, and the judgments docketed, in the office of the clerk of the district…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tuttle v. Jackson ex dem. HillsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Herrick v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. MacKechney v. Temple Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Todd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API