Legal Opinion

Maxey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1900No. 1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

No statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of playing at a ¿ame with cards, and be prosecutes this appeal.

The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the .appeal, because there is no recognizance in the record, nor a certificate that appellant is confined in jail. In reply to this, appellant has filed .an affidavit of the county judge to the effect that a recognizance was actually taken in open court. This is not sufficient. The recognizance should have been entered of record in the final minutes of the court. A recognizance is an undertaking entered into before a court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dement v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Brinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API