Maxey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
No statement necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of playing at a ¿ame with cards, and be prosecutes this appeal.
The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the .appeal, because there is no recognizance in the record, nor a certificate that appellant is confined in jail. In reply to this, appellant has filed .an affidavit of the county judge to the effect that a recognizance was actually taken in open court. This is not sufficient. The recognizance should have been entered of record in the final minutes of the court. A recognizance is an undertaking entered into before a court of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dement v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Brinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.