Legal Opinion

Centaur Co. v. Reinecke

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1898No. 759Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas. Suit by the Centaur Company against A. F. Reinecke for unfair competition in trade, and to enjoin the use of am alleged infringing label. An application for a preliminary injunction was denied, and plaintiff appeals. Centaur Co. v. Neathery, 91 Fed. 891, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

SWAYNE, District Judge.

The answers in this cause, and in the one against J. M. Neathery in the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district o,f Texas, show that the said Reinecke and Neathery were at the time of (lie filing of the bills in the respective cases engaged in the manufacture of Castoria; that they were partners in said business, and jointly interested therein. The case made by the bill, answer, and exhibits was identical with that of Centaur Co. v. Neathery, 91 Fed. 891. The two causes were argued and submitted together, and the decision of the court in that case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Centaur Co. v. NeatheryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API