Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1985No. WCB 80-06928; CA A29177; WCB 81-00582; CA A29279; SC S31315Published

1DissentLent, J.

I agree with the majority that “total disability” as used in ORS 656.210(1) means

“the loss, including preexisting disability, of use or function of any scheduled or unscheduled portion of the body which incapacitates the worker from regularly performing work at a gainful and suitable occupation.”

I further agree that when the loss is permanent the worker is permanently totally disabled and that when the loss is only temporary the worker is temporarily totally disabled. I further agree that our decision in Bono v. SAIF, 298 Or 405, 692 P2d 606 (1984), does not govern the case at bar.1 also…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gillen's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Weber v. American Silk Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1915
  3. Bono v. State Accident InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lindeman v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hanna v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API