Legal Opinion

McGuirk v. Ross

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 14, 1960No. 29, 1960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

Mrs. Ross, plaintiff below, brought suit against Mrs. McGuirk to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident.

Plaintiff’s car was hit from the rear by the car immediately in back of her. That car in turn had been struck by defendant’s car.

Mrs. Ross’ glasses were broken in the collision. She went back to Mrs. McGuirk’s car and told Mrs. McGuirk of the breaking of her glasses, and said that she expected them to be replaced. Mrs. McGuirk said that she would pay for the glasses and gave Mrs. Ross her name and address. On the following day Mrs. Ross…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hob Tea Room, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Tatman v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington RailroadCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williams v. GlashTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hicks v. SorokaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
  4. In Re the Appraisal of Enstar Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1991
  5. Reason v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API