Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. City and County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1983No. Civ. 51285PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

On appeal from a denial of mandate, we consider the dispositive issue whether a lessee under a written real property lease has standing to apply for a conditional use permit as an “owner” within the meaning of section 303, subdivision (b) of the San Francisco City Planning Code. For the reasons discussed herein, we conclude that appellant-lessee is entitled to apply for the conditional use permit for consideration on its merits.

The facts are relatively straightforward: Shell Oil has operated an automobile service station on the subject real property (the northeast…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Minney v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Marinelli v. Board of Appeal of the Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. First Presbyterian Church of Berkeley v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Frank Hardie Advertising, Inc. v. City of Dubuque Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of West RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API