Shell Oil Co. v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RACANELLI, P. J.
On appeal from a denial of mandate, we consider the dispositive issue whether a lessee under a written real property lease has standing to apply for a conditional use permit as an “owner” within the meaning of section 303, subdivision (b) of the San Francisco City Planning Code. For the reasons discussed herein, we conclude that appellant-lessee is entitled to apply for the conditional use permit for consideration on its merits.
The facts are relatively straightforward: Shell Oil has operated an automobile service station on the subject real property (the northeast…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Minney v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Marinelli v. Board of Appeal of the Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- First Presbyterian Church of Berkeley v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Frank Hardie Advertising, Inc. v. City of Dubuque Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of West RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989