Legal Opinion · Dissent

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Cornell Steamship Company, of the Tug, Lion

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 7, 1959No. 25081_1Published

1DissentByers, District Judge

I am constrained to dissent from so much of the court’s opinion as sustains the finding of the District Court, that any damage sustained by the libelant’s structure should be visited upon the “Lion.”

It is not disputed that there was a rubbing along the “icebreaker” by two scows at the tail end of the Cornell tow, on the port side. Thus the fact of contact or collision, if that term be preferred, is accepted as a datum.

The libelant rested under the necessity also of demonstrating that the damage of which it complains, was caused thereby. That proposition is self-evident, but authority to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API