People v. Smock
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
A jury convicted these defendants of arson. The Court of Appeals (Judge Holbrook dissenting) reversed the convictions on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to connect the defendants to the crime. We disagree.
The record discloses that a caravan of 20 to 30 automobiles carrying a total of at least 40 persons forcibly trespassed upon a school construction site in Roscommon County. In the space of approximately 15 minutes, members of this caravan started six separate fires, slashed the fuel lines and punctured the fuel tanks of heavy construction vehicles, punctured fuel oil…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ParksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. MangiapaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. OrsieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- People of Michigan v. Emmanuel Antoine BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- People of Michigan v. Erwin HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People of Michigan v. Robert Antoine MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.