Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Leuschner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 27, 1984No. 84-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Chief Judge.

In this case, the issue is whether the trial court erred in computing mesne profits awarded to a successful plaintiff in ejectment. The appellants, defendants below, are handicapped on this appeal by the absence of a transcript of the trial, which was not reported. See Sroczyk v. Fritz, 220 So.2d 908 (Fla.1969); Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Balzam v. Cohen, 427 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Mills v. Heenan, 382 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

The defendants below — Johnson, West and Arns — took possession in 1979 of certain realty owned by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Pillans Smith Co., Inc. v. LoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Kester v. BostwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  4. Mills v. HeenanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Sroczyk v. FritzSupreme Court of Florida · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API