Legal Opinion

Doe v. Smith

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2016No. 2015-CA-00740-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, JUSTICE,

FOR THE COURT:

¶1. When consent for a supposedly “uncontested” adoption is gained by intentionally concealing the identity of a known natural parent from the chancellor, a fraud is perpetrated upon the court.1 Such was the case here, where the natural mother schemed to give away her child without the natural father’s consent. She did so by falsely claiming — in her sworn consent and joinder and testimony at the adoption proceedings — that she was unaware of her son’s natural father. And her deception caused the court to grant an adoption to a third party based on false,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Bankers Mortgage Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Stringfellow v. StringfellowMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kerwit Medical Products, Inc. v. N. & H. Instruments, Inc. (Humanetics, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Clarence J. Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Angela Renee Gartman Jones v. James Richard JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 2026
  2. In the Matter of the Adoption of D.A.S., a Minor: B.N. v. K.P., Individually and as Next Friend, J.P., Individually and as Next Friend, and K.F.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API