Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Birmingham News Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1964No. 6 Div. 935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment granting a motion for a new trial. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for $15,000 on a complaint charging invasion of the right of privacy in Count One and libel in Count Two.

The trial court granted the motion solely upon the grounds charging that the verdict was excessive.

The sole question presented to us is whether the granting of the motion for new trial on the ground of excessiveness of the verdict was error to reverse.

When reviewing the trial court’s action in granting a new trial on the ground of excessiveness of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Parker v. Hayes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Kent v. LindseyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. McCombs v. West End Baptist HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Sansing v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mobley v. Brundidge Banking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Adams v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Yellow Cab Co. of Birmingham, Inc. v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Grubbs v. Long-Lewis Hardware CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Tidwell v. BadgettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API