Legal Opinion
St. Charles Hospital & Rehabilitation Center v. Royal Globe Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 23, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants Royal Globe Insurance Company and Royal Insurance Company of America are obligated to indemnify the plaintiff in an underlying medical malpractice action entitled *736Mulholland v St. Charles Hospital, commenced in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under index No. 3941/96, the defendants Royal Globe Insurance Company and Royal Insurance Company of America appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated April 28, 2004, as granted the motion of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Argo Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- USAA Casualty Insurance v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- American Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023