Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Groll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1939No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 40,315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The bill should not be dismissed.

The decree providing for foreclosure should stand, but with the modification that Bernard J. Groll, the vendee in the land contract, and not John E. Nolan, the assignee of the vendee, or, by reason of his death, his estate, is liable for deficiency, if any, upon sale.

There was no novation releasing the vendee from liability, nor was he released by failure of the vendor to notify him of default in payments by his assignee.

Nolan, the assignee of the vendee, did not in the assignment assume and agree to make the land contract payments, and as this case is heard…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kramer v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Peterson v. LaMayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API